Radioctive dating against evolution Xxx texting chats
Yet most people really don’t know much about these radioactive dating methods.
So slick and convincing are the presentations of results, particularly in glossy media and museum propaganda, that no one even bothers to question how these dating methods work, what assumptions are involved, and how reliable they are. The answers are not only instructive, but demolish the evolutionary geologist’s case for a 4.5-billion-year old earth.
Recently, the radioactive dating method which geologists (and physicists) have considered to be perhaps the most reliable has come under heavy ‘fire’.Radiocarbon dating is one such type of radiometric dating.A process for determining the age of an object by measuring the amount of a given radioactive material it contains.Many Creationists have argued that scientists would not accept any evidence against the Theory of Evolution.There are some claims that this has already happened, and that the evidence has been ignored or even suppressed. Egotism, embarrassment or greed might cause one person to try to hide something. However, history shows that the process of science is extremely good at detecting and correcting such problems.